Understanding Kierkegaard

Kierkegaard is at first brush not the most appealing character. His genius is hidden behind various masks. His voluminous writings makes it difficult to easily penetrate to his essence and summarize his contribution. His insistence to be called a religious writer rather than a philosopher makes him more difficult to relate to him from a modern point of view. So here is a synopsis of my understanding of the most salient points that can be extracted from Kiekergaard. This list does not claim to be definitive nor complete but a starting point towards a journey of understanding Kiekergaard

  1. Irony is the individual’s tool that equalize the playing field between the individual and society as a whole irrespective of the culture and values of society at any point in time.
  2. To truly live the individual must find a way to live, something worth living and dying for, something to make life significant.
  3. The individual can not accept knowledge at face value but is obliged to assimilate his/her own knowledge.
  4. To know truth is not to claim knowledge for ourselves but to hone our skill to identify inconsistencies. 5) The tension created by the exposed contradictions outweighs the value of soothing it away with complacency and ignorant acceptance.
  5. Bringing everything into doubt, by questioning everything, however leads to despair and serve no purpose but ends where even the validity of a person’s own life is doubted.
  6. Irony and wit are the tools for opening up points of significance that are essential to develop personal truths without alienating oneself from the world itself.
  7. Significance is lost in a life of immediacy, discontinuity, being accidental, driven by interests and  external focus.
  8. When life becomes a series of momentary excitements strung on a string like beads or a continual search for new interests, it leads to boredom and lack of significance.
  9. Ethics is the threshold that must be crossed to enter into a relationship with Divinity for the ethical life grows in nobility an honor; it does not trickle away in a series of unconnected thrills and fascinating experiences.
  10. Man must make a decisive choice to become an individual through an  ethical awakening
  11. True significance is found in entering into the correct relationship with Divinity expressed through works of love.
  12. Human love is transient, the love aspired to must have its source in the Divine, which is eternal.
  13. Divine love is not a feeling but it is a duty – an obligation to recognize and value the otherness of others.
  14. Divine love acknowledges the equality of all others without any differentiation and entice individuality to be expressed to everybody in the same way, irrespective of who they are.
  15. Divine love involves the same emotions of fellow-feeling in every action in such a way that the individual can rejoice in his/her individuality.
  16. Divine love however is also  such that each self is so identified with the other that they have absorbed each other, and find no “other” – no separate reality – in another person, for there is no person that exist apart.

Philosophy and mindfulness 

I am doing a course on mindfulness through Coursera.  The balance created by looking at non-Buddhist sources on the topic of mindfulness was for me inspiring and brought me much closer to the ideas that had been presented. It seems that the term mindfulness has been drawn from Buddhist origin but the concept of mindfulness is certainly not a concept that is new to the West. As was shown in the discussion on Stoicism the idea of being mindful might be viewed from a slightly different perspective but it definitely deals with the topic of mindfulness. Since Stoic philosophy is basic to my own philosophy I can relate strongly to the stoic definition of mindfulness. My own mindfulness practice was drawn primarily from Western thought and less from the east. I personally think that the Western Esoteric tradition and mystical movements has a lot to contribute to the mindfulness debate. I fully understand that this course cannot tap into all the sources.

 

On the temple of Delphi in ancient Greece above the portal was inscribed the injunction “know thyself”, is that not in part a call for mindfulness. The Western mystery traditions have for ages focused on tools and techniques to acquire a better or more mindful perspective of who we are through self knowledge. Plato’s students used the hypomnemata as the foundation to his philosophic approach to knowledge. The hypomnemata constituted a material memory of things read, heard, or thought, thus offering these as an accumulated treasure for rereading and later meditation. Plato’s concept of idealism claimed that reality is fundamentally mental…and gave within its definition emphasis to mindfulness. Plato was a student of Socrates who taught us much about critical thinking…or an awareness not to take things at face value but to critically question things. That ability to question is another vehicle to mindfulness. Pythagoras taught his students to be quiet for 5 years as part of their philosophical training and showed the importance of silence as a means to mindfulness. We might even see that as a very extreme approach to achieve mindfulness from refraining to speak. Thus if we look at the cauldron of Western thinking as it is given down from ancient Greece we see how an approach to mindfulness has shaped and developed itself.

 

Plato, Socrates and Pythagoras had a certain influence on the development of Stoicism in ancient Roman thinking since they are quoted by Stoic philosophers. We see that central to stoicism is the mindfulness of what is important and what is not, what is within our control and what is not. This is a mindfulness that is a practical day to day awareness. Combine that with the two Stoic practices to envision the day ahead in the morning and to evaluate the day at the end of the day are further tools brought to the front to mindfulness on a practical level. The Stoics extended mindfulness to an even higher conception by putting virtue as the ultimate focus that should pervade our lives in order for us to be truly happy and taste the Ultimate Good.

 

Hermeticism is a religious, philosophical system based on writings attributed to Hermes Tresmegistus. These writings had a significant impact on Western philosophical development. Hermetic tradition holds that all is mind and mind is all.  Thus the whole tradition puts another strong emphasis on a reason to be “mindful”. The maxim “As above so below” reflects something of the mindfulness that reflects from the Hermetica for it states that whatever happens in reality also happens on every other level, which includes the mental level. Thus for the Hermetic practitioner mindfulness is an awareness of how our thinking impact on our perception of reality and visa versa. The Hermetic Arcanum for example says: “Let him that is desirous of this knowledge, clear his mind from all evil passions, especially pride, which is an abomination to heaven, and is as the gate of Hell; let him be frequent in prayer and charitable; have little to do with the world: abstain from company keeping; enjoy constant tranquillity; that the Mind may be able to reason more freely in private and be highly lifted up; unless it be kindled with a beam of Divine Light, it will not be able to penetrate these hidden mysteries of truth”. This might sound over religious but it is still a clear call to clear the mind in order to fill it with a different type of thinking.

 

If we jump to a a later age we find that even Sir Roger Bacon who started the idea of a scientific method with the maxim “Knowledge is power” was born from a concept of a call for a more mindfulness of what truly is. Until Sir Roger Bacon the scientific thinking was mainly based on what people thought and said and not through an experiential search. The product of science was a product from Western thought to become more mindful of what actually can be observed, tabulated and tested. That is in itself a call for greater mindfulness not just by asking critical questions but also by a scientific process of investigation.

 

We can trace back the idea to more recent Western philosophers like Descartes who proclaimed the adage: “Cognito ergo sum” or “I think therefore I am”. With it he placed at the centre of Western mindfulness the idea that we can doubt everything but we can be certain that we exist through the knowing that we are thinking. It is no wonder that Descartes writing is called “Meditations on first philosophy” We gain a deep sense of certainty when we focus our attention on our selves and more specifically our thinking. That certainty is the ultimate leverage from where man can begin with a certainty that is self-evident and not a deduction. We can continue and look at a plethora of Western Philosophers that brought some insight to a Western conception of mindfulness. 

 

A deeper search will also show that traditional world religions e.g. Christianity, Judaism and Muslim all have approaches to mindfulness although it might be coloured through different lenses. The principle I want to convey is that almost all religions and traditions had some view on mindfulness and that if one really want to develop an appreciation of the richness within the idea of mindfulness there is still much more to be extracted into the cauldron of “constructive mindfulness” as a learning method that continues to evolve the concept of mindfulness.

 

There is too much to go into in more detail. I am quiet amused how much emphasis “constructive mindfulness” places on Buddhism as the source of mindfulness and mentions other traditions as more peripheral ideas that might be considered. It will bode well for constructive mindfulness in a modern jacket to consider the rich tradition and thought from the West.  The result might be an approach even more suited for modernity that is neither Western nor Eastern but a true investigation in all traditions. 

Pliny the Younger and Ancient Rome

Pliny seems to have been trained in philosophy but he is not writing a philosopher but rather as an administrator. He was held in high regard by a wide circle of friends, the public at large and most importantly the Emperor Trajan. Through the eyes of Pliny I discovered the excellence that earmarked a successful ordinary Roman citizen. His letters represents him as a wealthy, hardworking man that walks in prominent circles and devoted to continually learn. His life looks no different from a modern leader in modern society. I find Pliny managing his estates and finances with care and that he goes on holidays like I would do during a good vacation. In Roman life he was far richer, busier and involved in politics than what I can ever dream to be. Pliny provides a view of social and political life of the Roman Empire during the second century Christian era.

Since my interest is in the advancement of civilisation it is worthwhile to look at the context in  which Pliny lived in terms of the Emperor Trajan. Trajan is generally seen as a good emperor and was given the title as “the best” and put forward as an example of what a Roman Emperor should look like to all following emperors of Rome. Every emperor after him was honoured by the Senate with the wish “felicior Augusto, melior Traiano” (luckier than Augustus and beter than Trajan). In Trajan’s time we see the Roman empire extend its boarders to the biggest territorial area in its history as well as some significant building programs to advance the Roman empire’s society. Ancient sources on Trajan’s personality and accomplishments are unanimously positive.  Pliny describe Trajan as a “good” emperor in that, by himself, he approved or blamed the same things the Senate would have approved or blamed. It means he did not use his position to override the will of the Senate and respected the authority of a wider system of consultation. If in reality Trajan was an autocrat, his deferential behaviour towards his peers qualified him to the role of virtuous monarch. Trajan wielded autocratic power through moderatio instead of contumacia – moderation instead of insolence.

Despite being ancient Rome, Pliny lives in a complex empire bigger than most countries in the modern world with less technological resources to aid him. We talk of a time of success and progress and it is worthwhile to try and see what made Roman Civilisation successful. I had always been aware of the prowess of the Roman Army but failed to see that such a huge empire can only be manage over such a long period if there is some successful administrative system behind it that works like clockwork. This system of governance was a key success factor to sustain Roman civilisation. Pliny provides me with a view into that world and I would like to extract those elements that seems part of the success recipe of ancient Rome.

 

 

 

Inner strength

Today I write from a position of strength. I have taken virtue and made it my own. Everyday is moving me closer to wisdom. I am using every tool at my disposal to expand my consciousness and become a more productive individual. I face my challenges with courage and listen to others with understanding. Reasoning is the pillar on which I build my conduct, understanding cause and effect. I work daily on my inner world and reap the rewards of equanimity and freedom. I have no fear of old age nor death. When the time comes I will depart as I lived with an inner peace and serenity. In the mean time I will not leave any stone unturned to be of service to humanity and to be an exemplary influence wherever my presence is felt. I judge no-one for being good or bad but set the example in my every step of virtue coming into being. I do not hesitate to take action with prudence as my guide and prowess is gained through daily practice. I fear no enemy for they can not touch that which is amaranthine within me.   Every moment my conscious is expanding through my inner world. The core of power is fixed, the love I can expressed is unstoppable and my will enforced. My thoughts are not straying in all directions but it is harnessed and directed like a laser beam to where I want my attention to be. Thoughts lifted ever higher by noble thoughts, honorable deeds and just action. I check every thought to ensure it is molded against my ideal, supporting it, constructing the ideal irrespective of my circumstances for my circumstances are not me. Whether I am isolated or within a crowed I am never lonely even when I am alone for  within me I am connected to universal consciousness ever aware that all is connected. I trust my inner master, I do not waiver in front of urgency for I know my strength and knowledge comes from within. My challenges are my practice grounds to strengthen the fibers of virtue that is spun into my mind, unbreakable. The light is within me and the darkest night can not dull that light for it is lit from the eternal source that is ever burning. I seek balance and harmony on all levels of existence and eradicate the slightest imbalance, detected by a sensitive conscience, ever vigilant. I stretch my experience into unknown realms past the fears of darkness, the illusions of materiality into the realm of creativity. There I reach for all the creative forces at my disposal to direct them to creative action, innovating the human experience. I find stillness in my confidence, equanimity in my being unperturbed moving towards the one goal of continued spiritual evolution. Nothing can be taken from the bright radiance of virtue ignited by the eternal source omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent.  I am. I am. I am. Whole and part and part of the Whole, integrated and contributing towards continuing evolution.

Walking through the darkness

I am finding my solace in the dark corners of my inner being. As much as I try I am again in that deep darkness where no topic seems to present itself for me to write about. I walk through the darkness and my lamp seems very dim. I can see only the next step, enough not to stumble but not enough to see where the road is leading. Yet, I am not afraid of the darkness. It is life to be surrounded by darkness when the light is not shining. Like the day the sun does not always shine and we have to be comfortable to at times walk in the dark. I ask my lamp why he is not shining as bright as ever and I do not get an answer. Maybe it is just an off day or the fuel is just low. I need to find the source that will fill up the lamp so that it can shine bright again. I might have to stray from the path I know so well and close the doors behind me. All that is familiar is in the past behind me, served me when I needed it but it is no longer mine to have nor my support. I have to walk alone. There is no wise sage with the answers whom I can hope to meet along the way that can give me insight into the path ahead. I am without a map, and without a compass, I might even be walking in circles when I have no reference point. I only know the strength within me, it is the only thing I can rely on. Maybe it is one of the lessons that must be learned in this life….to be able to be self confident, stand alone and find your own way. It is path of maturity that only the hermit will know. Maybe it is my initiation deeper into my own mystery. I sat and contemplated, I listened to the master within and I a no closer to an answer, a clear vision or plan of action. I need to understand what the lesson is that I need to know and learn.  Has the edge of reason been reached? Maybe it is time to also call upon the heart to direct the way. I have a troubled relationship with my heart. Te heart does not judge and it flaunts logic and yet somehow it is excellent at staying the course and knowing what is right even when it is not logical. But I am also aware that neither heart or mind is the inner strength for the inner strength comes from will and there is no organ through which will is expressed. Will is the function of mind and the domain of the knower for the knower knows above all Divine Will.  The knower wills our experience for us to become adept in the darkness. The knower is the source of the light that can fuel again the lamp to light up the darkness.